HENNESSY ET UX.

v.

HENNESSY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Sherred Vill. Assocs., 708 F.2d 804 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …time, first in right” and “choateness” rules controlled and that, under those rules, HUD’s mortgage was entitled to priority over the mechanics’ lien asserted by Herco-form. We affirmed. See 568 F. 2d 217 (1st Cir.1978). In 1979, the Supreme Court, 441 U.S. 901, 99 S.Ct. 1987, 60 L.Ed.2d 370, vacated the judgment and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., supra. We in turn remanded it to the district court, where HUD joined with Chicago Title and…
• Fed. Land Bank OF Wichita v. Ferguson, 896 F.2d 1244 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …1 n. 8, 99 S.Ct. at 1454-55 n. 8. Willow Creek Lumber Co. v. Porter County Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 572 F. 2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.1978); Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Sherred Village Assocs., 568 F. 2d 217, 219-20 (1st Cir.1978), vacated and remanded, 441 U.S. 901, 99 S.Ct. 1987, 60 L.Ed.2d 370 (1979). We take up the story in the mid-1970’s, prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Kimbell Foods. At that time, the circuits split into two general lines of authority on the issue whether this federal common law…