MATHIAS

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Rouco, 765 F.2d 983 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …contained insufficient information about her ability to understand the English language for her name to be drawn for the venire from which the jury in his case was selected. See United States v. Santos, 588 F. 2d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906, 99 S.Ct. 1994, 60 L.Ed.2d 374 (1979); Bumpus v. Uniroyal Tire Co., 392 F.Supp. 1405, 1406 (E.D.Pa.1975). Rouco’s challenge to Mrs. Flores' qualification to serve was based solely on what transpired in the courtroom during the court’s voir dire of t…
• United States v. Henry, 615 F.2d 1223 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …e length of the delay between the time of Henry’s arrest and the time of trial was a little over one year. This court has held periods longer than this to be permissible. See United States v. Santos, 588 F. 2d 1300, 1302-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906, 99 S.Ct. 1994, 60 L.Ed.2d 374 (1979) (15 months); United States v. Penland, 429 F. 2d 9 (9th Cir. 1970) (17 months). By itself, a delay of one year does not establish the defendant’s claim, although it is a sufficiently lengthy period to warrant cl…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, 670 F.2d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …the performance of their duties. See Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress v. Federal Energy Administration, Civ.No. 76-0027 (D.D.C. June 18, 1976) aff’d per curiam by an equally divided court, 192 U.S.App.D.C. 143, 591 F. 2d 752 (1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906, 99 S.Ct. 1994, 60 L.Ed.2d 374 (1979). It does not apply to “secret law” contained in the rules and practices by which an agency regulates its own staff. Jordan v. United States Department of Justice, 192 U.S.App.D.C. 144, 154, 591 F. 2d 753, 763 (1…