STEWART

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Herman v. State, 396 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …liber as the shell casings found at the scene of the murder. The matching caliber was a circumstance of some probative value. Williams v. State, 73 Fla. 1198, 75 So. 785 (1917); United States v. Gandolfo, 577 F. 2d 955 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 933, 99 S.Ct. 2056, 60 L.Ed.2d 662 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 560 F. 2d 507, 509 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 1451, 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978). The expert’s testimony that he could not say one way or the other whether the shot…
• Wilson v. Beebe, 770 F.2d 578 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …ce communication required by a standing departmental order and it met all of the requirements for admissibility set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes for Rule 803. See Baker v. Elcona Homes Corp., 588 F. 2d 551, 558 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 933, 99 S.Ct. 2054, 60 L.Ed.2d 661 (1979). Beebe’s Rule 407 argument has no merit. The report did not recommend a change in procedures following the shooting; it was a report of that incident and nothing more. Finally, the standard of review when the a…
• United States v. Bosby, 675 F.2d 1174 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …onstituted a waiver. Nor does the failure to sign the written waiver form demonstrate that the waiver was involuntary. United States v. Klein, 592 F. 2d 909, 914 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Stewart, 585 F. 2d 799, 800 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 933, 99 S.Ct. 2054, 60 L.Ed.2d 661 (1978). Accordingly, the statements made by defendant Hill after his arrest but before he requested counsel were properly admitted at trial. . For example, one bank official testified that she was “suspicious” of Ran…