HARRIES

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Washington v. State, 419 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …e have routinely rejected claims that defense counsel needed to be free to abandon a ‘united front’ strategy. See, e.g., United States v. Medel, 592 F. 2d 1305, 1312 (5th Cir. 1979); Canal Zone v. Hodges, 589 F. 2d 207, 210 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 2173, 60 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1979). The claims of conflict here are based entirely on appellate counsel’s theories — developed with the benefit of the entire record — on what each defendant’s most effective response to the government’s evidenc…
• United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …rt may exercise its discretion in resentencing. It is noted that since it is the “cumulation of sentence” which is illegal, we are not required to vacate Gray-son’s convictions. Cf. United States v. Gomez, 593 F. 2d 210, 217 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 2172, 60 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1979); United States v. Corson, 449 F. 2d 544, 551 (3d Cir.1971). In this case, the appropriate course would be to vacate Grayson’s sentence on all counts and impose sentences on the non-CCE counts consecutive, if t…
• United States v. Lewis, 621 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ly “where.” It intrudes on personal privacy less than a wiretap, cf. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967), but more than visual observation, cf. United States v. Pitts, 588 F. 2d 102 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 2171, 60 L.Ed.2d 1051. See generally Note, Tracking Katz: Beepers, Privacy and the Fourth Amendment, 86 Yale L.J. 1461 (1977). The problem is compounded when beepers are used to track the location of goods. [*1388] There is less of a priv…