WARDEN

v.

KANSAS

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …rt may exercise its discretion in resentencing. It is noted that since it is the “cumulation of sentence” which is illegal, we are not required to vacate Gray-son’s convictions. Cf. United States v. Gomez, 593 F. 2d 210, 217 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 2172, 60 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1979); United States v. Corson, 449 F. 2d 544, 551 (3d Cir.1971). In this case, the appropriate course would be to vacate Grayson’s sentence on all counts and impose sentences on the non-CCE counts consecutive, if t…
• United States v. Lewis, 621 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ly “where.” It intrudes on personal privacy less than a wiretap, cf. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967), but more than visual observation, cf. United States v. Pitts, 588 F. 2d 102 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S.Ct. 2171, 60 L.Ed.2d 1051. See generally Note, Tracking Katz: Beepers, Privacy and the Fourth Amendment, 86 Yale L.J. 1461 (1977). The problem is compounded when beepers are used to track the location of goods. [*1388] There is less of a priv…
• United States v. Veatch, 647 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ager — is not subject to the Fourth Amendment because the private actor is motivated in whole or in part by a unilateral desire to aid in the enforcement of the law.” United States v. Gumerlock, 590 F. 2d 794, 800 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 948, 99 S. Ct. 2173, 60 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1979). See also United States v. Gomez, 614 F. 2d 643, 645 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Sherwin, 539 F. 2d 1 (9th Cir. 1976) (en banc). In United States v. Stevens, 601 F. 2d 1075, 1080 (9th Cir.), cert. denie…