CALIFORNIA
v.
ARIZONA ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court appointed a Special Master to manage proceedings and evidence collection.
The Court is issuing an order to appoint a Special Master to oversee the filing of pleadings and direct proceedings. The Master will have authority to…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Master Appointment cases and more on FLexlaw
It is ordered that Honorable Roy W. Harper, Senior Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri, be appointed Special Master in this case with authority’ to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary to call for. The Master is directed' to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.
It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court. [For earlier order herein, see 439 U. S. 812.]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682 (U.S. 1979)…contends that these changes moot this case. Respondent Evelyn Elliott died in 1973. Counsel 'for the respondent class moved to substitute Nancy Yamasaki as the respondent named in the caption of the case in this Court, and that motion was granted. 441 U. S. 959 (1979). In order to be consistent with the heretofore published reports of these cases, we refer to the decisions in the District Courts and Court of Appeals by their original captions. For respondents Isabelle Ortiz, Jordan Silva, and John Vaquila…
Authorities Cited
- Pemberton v. Sperandio, 439 U.S. 812 (U.S. 1978)
- Arizona v. California, 439 U.S. 812 (U.S. 1978)