NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (90 total)

• Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston, 459 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1983)
  …U. S. 426 (1964) (§ 14(a) of 1934 Act); Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Ltd., 624 F. 2d 1216 (CA4 1980) (§ 13 of 1934 Act), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1101 (1981); Kirshner v. United States, 603 F. 2d 234, 241 (CA2 1978) (§ 17(a) of 1934 Act), cert. denied, 442 U. S. 909 (1979). But see, e. g., Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, 442 U. S. 560 (1979) (no implied private right of action under § 17(a) of 1934 Act); Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., 430 U. S. 1 (1977) (defeated tender offeror has no implied private ri…
• United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …tment also set out the numbers of the drafts that were sent through the mail, the names of the payees, and the amounts involved. All of this information was correct. The variance in United States v. Cook, 586 F. 2d 572 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 2821, 61 L.Ed.2d 274 (1979), where the indictment charged a mailing to the United States Air Force and the evidence showed the mailing went to the General Services Administration, was considered a “technical variance . .. best relegated to…
• Huddleston v. Herman & MacLEAN, 640 F.2d 534 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …) (same). See also Lincoln National Bank v. Herber, 604 F. 2d 1038, 1040 n.2 (7th Cir. 1979) [finding a cause of action under § 17(a) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)]; Kirshner v. United States, 603 F. 2d 234, 241 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909, 99 S.Ct. 2821, 61 L.Ed.2d 274 and cert. denied sub nom., 444 U.S. 995, 100 S.Ct. 531, 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979) (same); Newman v. Prior, 518 F. 2d 97, 99 (4th Cir. 1975) (same). But see Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F. 2d 152, 159 (8th Cir…