THACKER
v.
ISON, FORESTRY CAMP SUPERINTENDENT; AND THACKER V. BORDENKIRCHER, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
THACKER
ISON, FORESTRY CAMP SUPERINTENDENT; AND THACKER V. BORDENKIRCHER, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
442 U.S. 912
Supreme Court of the United States (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)…CA2), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 1071 (1970); United States v. Atkinson, 565 F. 2d 1283, 1284-1285 (CA4 1977), cert. denied, 436 U. S. 944 (1978); Foxworth v. Wainwright, supra, at 1077; Thacker v. Bordenkircher, 590 F. 2d 640, 642 (CA6), cert. denied, 442 U. S. 912 (1979); United States v. Mandell, supra, at 677-678; United States v. Cox, 580 F. 2d, at 321-323; United States v. Kutas, 542 F. 2d 527, 529 (CA9 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1073 (1977); cf. United [*349] States v. Carrigan, 543 F. 2d 1053, 1056…
-
Lenza v. Wyrick, 665 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1981)…applies despite a state court’s error in deciding the merits of a defendant’s fourth amendment claim. E.g., Swicegood v. Alabama, 577 F. 2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1978); see also United States ex rel. Maxey v. Morris, 591 F. 2d 386 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2828, 61 L.Ed.2d 278 (1979); Dupont v. Hall, 555 F. 2d 15 (1st Cir. 1977). Moreover, the Stone bar applies with equal force to procedural mistakes that thwart the presentation of fourth amendment claims. E.g., Williams v. Brown, 609 F. 2d…
-
Leodis Dortch v. O'Leary, 863 F.2d 1337 (7th Cir. 1988)…owell precludes.” Sanders v. Israel, 717 F. 2d 422 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1033, 104 S.Ct. 1302, 79 L.Ed.2d 701 (1984) (citations omitted). Indeed, in United States ex rel. Maxey v. Morris, 591 F. 2d 386, 389 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2828, 61 L.Ed.2d 278 (1979), this court stated: “Stone thus establishes that state court constitutional holdings, at least in the context of Fourth Amendment questions involving application of the exclusionary rule, are not subject to col…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence