GAISFORD

v.

NEUSCHATZ

Citator

Cited By

• Rolls v. Bliss & Nyitray, Inc., 408 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …U. S. Precast Corp., 322 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) (carrier); Edwards v. Trulis, 212 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) (stock broker), and as to the practice of architecture, see, Gaisford v. Neuschatz, 201 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 207 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1967) (implicitly recognizing that a contract made in violation of Chapter 467 would be unenforceable, but finding plaintiff’s activity an isolated transaction not constituting the practice of architecture so as to bring into play the rule). Ad…
• Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 478 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …. County of Dade, 187 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). The lender believes otherwise and cites us to Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and to Miami Beach First National Bank v. Borbiro, 201 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 207 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1967), for the proposition that the limitation period, assuming one continuous contract, does not begin to run until the final termination, or completion, of the relationship. However, these cases are not convincing considering the posture of t…
• Moneyhun v. Vital Indus., Inc., 611 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …running at that time, and therefore appellant’s action for quantum meruit is barred because it was not brought before August 1989. Matthews, 222 So. 2d at 286; Miami Beach First Nat’l Bank v. Borbiro, 201 So. 2d 571, 572 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 207 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1967). In regard to Count III, alleging fraud, the parties also agree that fraud is governed by the four-year limitations provision of section 95.11(3)(j). Under Section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985), the four-year period for fraud action…

Authorities Cited

• Gaisford v. Neuschatz, 201 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)