SAHARA-TAHOE CORP.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (65 total)

• United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …bility of the Underhill statements, the waiver issue was one for the trial court to decide in accordance with the stringent standards set out in part IIIA of this opinion. Cf. United States v. James, 590 F. 2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917, 99 S.Ct. 2836, 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979) (trial court alone must decide admissibility of co-conspirators’ statements). Nevertheless, submission of this issue to the jury did not constitute plain error inasmuch as the jury was required to find the exis…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …statements of a co-conspirator, their admissibility is governed by United States v. Apollo, 476 F. 2d 156 (5th Cir. 1973), because the case was tried prior to our decision in United States v. James, 590 F. 2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917, 99 S.Ct. 2836, 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). Two of the statements 18 objected to are not hearsay as they were admitted for limited purposes only and not to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The third statement objected to19 was testimony by Debbi…
• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …knowing participation in the drug conspiracy. Hernandez also claims that (6) the district court erred by admitting coconspirator hearsay statements against him in violation of United States v. James, 590 F. 2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917, 99 S.Ct. 2836, 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). Portal alleges that (7) the weight of the evidence supported his defense theory of entrapment, and the evidence was insufficient to establish his predisposition to commit the crime of conspiracy. Rios and Raymo…

  ← 1 / 2 →