SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Walker v. Graham, 438 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Cook v. Hanberry, 592 F. 2d 248 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 932, 99 S.Ct. 2866, 61 L.Ed.2d 301 (1979); North v. State, 217 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). MILLS, SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.…
• United States v. Prantil, 764 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …cutor’s remarks under the harmless error rule, Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a), to determine whether it is more probable than not that the improper remarks materially affected the verdict. United States v. Lyman, 592 F. 2d 496, 499 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 932, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979); United States v. Dixon, 562 F. 2d 1138, 1143 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927, 98 S.Ct. 1494, 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). We can appreciate the delicate position that the prosecutor faced by virtue of his…
• Kendrick v. Bland, 740 F.2d 432 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …of developing a program to safeguard against abridgement of constitutional rights in the future. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 499, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 1841, 36 L.Ed.2d 439, 455 (1973); Cook v. Hanberry, 596 F. 2d 658 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 932, 99 S.Ct. 2866, 61 L.Ed.2d 301 (1979) . Such an injunction may be attended by the appointment of a monitor with authority to observe defendants’ conduct and thereby permit the federal court to oversee compliance with its continuing order. See Ruiz v…