MUNIZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bulman, 667 F.2d 1374 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …n the public areas of a motel. Thus in Marullo the Court upheld the use of evidence discovered in the warrantless search of a crawl space under a motel cabin. Similarly, in United States v. Jackson, 588 F. 2d 1046, 1050-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941, 99 S.Ct. 2882, 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979), the Court, “[i]n view of the open, public, and shared atmosphere of a motel, the nearness of one’s neighbors, and the prevalence of uninvited listeners in human society,” id. at 1052, upheld the introduction in…
• United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ntertain a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt. United States v. Rodgers, 624 F. 2d 1303, 1306 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Witt, 618 F. 2d 283, 284 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Jackson, 588 F. 2d 1046, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941, 99 S.Ct. 2882, 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979). In a conspiracy case, the verdict must be sustained if, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, there is substantial evidence to support the conviction. United States v. Arrendondo-Mo…
• Weinberger v. Kendrick, 698 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …Act’s conferral of exclusive jurisdiction on federal courts, § 27, for violations of that act permits adjudication of all related claims only in those courts, see International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F. 2d 166, 175 n.5 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941, 99 S.Ct. 2884, 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979). A more difficult jurisdictional question would be raised by the inclusion of persons having only claims arising from purchases prior to the class period, if such there be. Such a person would lack the federal…