WASHINGTON

v.

NORTON MANUFACTURING CO.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 632 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …the familiar standard that the trial court has wide discretion in determining the scope and effect of discovery. Blum v. Gulf Oil Corp., 597 F. 2d 936 (5th Cir. 1979); Washington v. Norton Manufacturing, Inc., 588 F. 2d 441 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 2886, 61 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979); Aviation Specialities, Inc. v. United Technologies Corp., 568 F. 2d 1186 (5th Cir. 1978). Pan-Islamic first complains that the trial court’s dilatoriness in ruling on its motion to amend the complaint, despite…
• Pesaplastic v. Cincinnati Milacron Co., 750 F.2d 1516 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ability of a person or a corporation to suit, so long as state law does not exceed the limitations imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Washington v. Norton Manufacturing, Inc., 588 F. 2d 441, 444 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 2886, 61 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979);3 see Oriental Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel’s Bank, 701 F. 2d 889, 890 (11th Cir.1983); Rubaii v. Lakewood Pipe of Texas, Inc., 695 F. 2d 541, 543 (11th Cir.1983). Jurisdiction over Tedruth must t…
• Eaton v. Dorchester Dev., Inc., 692 F.2d 727 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …scertain their competency to entertain the merits. See Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351 n. 13, 98 S.Ct. 2380, 2389 n. 13, 57 L.Ed.2d 253 (1978); Washington v. Norton Manufacturing Co., 588 F. 2d 441, 443 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 942, 99 S.Ct. 2886, 61 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979); 8 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2009. The problem is the degree to which such discovery is mandatory or discretionary. We have held that such jurisdictional discovery is not entirely d…