WILLIAMS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …” evidence. . United States v. Welliver, 601 F. 2d 203, 207 (5th Cir. 1979). . United States v. Broome, 628 F. 2d 403, 405 (5th Cir.1980) (per curiam): Welliver, 601 F. 2d at 207-08; United States v. Davis, 592 F. 2d 1325 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 2894, 61 L.Ed.2d 318 (1979); United States v. Mann, 517 F. 2d 259, 267 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087, 96 S.Ct. 878, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Bearden, 423 F. 2d 805, 810-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 836…
• United States v. West, 670 F.2d 675 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …a defendant is charged is admissible only to prove motive, opportuni [*688] ty, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); United States v. Dolliole, 597 F. 2d 102 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 2894, 61 L.Ed.2d 318 (1979); United States v. Ostrowsky, 501 F. 2d 318 (7th Cir. 1974). The evidence about which King complains, however, is not evidence of other crimes. King was charged with conspiracy to receive bribes and with conspir…
• United States v. Peters, 791 F.2d 1270 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …of Fed.R.Evid. 403 balancing.” United States v. DeLillo, 620 F. 2d [939] at 944 [(2nd Cir.1980)]. The trial court’s “exercise of broad discretion will not lightly be disturbed[,]” United States v. Williams, 596 F. 2d 44, 50 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 2893, 61 L.Ed.2d 317 (1979), because it is in a better position to [*1292] evaluate both the probativeness and the prejudicial effect of evidence. United States v. Qamar, 671 F. 2d 732, 736 (2d Cir.1982) (citations omitted). Rule 401 def…