O'DONNELL ET AL.
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.
O'DONNELL ET AL.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.
444 U.S. 803
Supreme Court of the United States (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Amendments TO Rules Regulating THE Fla. Bar-1-3.1(a) & Rules OF Jud. Administration-2.065 (Legal AID), 573 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1990)…on of Trial Lawyers v. Moultrie, 725 F. 2d 695 (D.C.Cir.1984); Williamson v. Vardeman, 674 F. 2d 1211 (8th Cir.1982); White v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 646 F. 2d 203 (5th Cir.1981); Sparks v. Parker, 368 So. 2d 528 (Ala.), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 803, 100 S.Ct. 22, 62 L.Ed.2d 16 (1979); State ex rel. Stephan v. Smith, 242 Kan. 336, 747 P. 2d 816 (1987). Contra Bedford v. Salt Lake County, 22 Utah 2d 12, 447 P. 2d 193 (1968). . See also Kunhardt & Co. v. United States, 266 U.S. 537, 45 S.Ct. 158…
-
Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296 (U.S. 1989)…tates ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A., 481 U. S. 787, 821 (1987) (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Cf. Sparks v. Parker, 368 So. 2d 528 (Ala.) (rejecting constitutional challenges to compelled representation of indigent defendants), appeal dism’d, 444 U. S. 803 (1979). The lawyer’s duty to provide professional assistance to the poor is part of the ancient traditions of the bar long recognized by this Court and the courts of the several States.4 As Justice Field, then sitting on the California Supreme Court…