MANLEY INVESTMENT CO.

v.

THOMAS W. GARLAND, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hamblen v. State, 527 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1988)
  …79). Thereafter, Bishop’s standby lawyers filed a federal habeas corpus action. The district court denied the petition, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court denied an application for stay of execution. Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U.S. 807, 100 S.Ct. 29, 62 L.Ed.2d 20 (1979). In People v. Silagy, 101 Ill.2d 147, 77 Ill.Dec. 792, 461 N.E. 2d 415, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1067, 105 S.Ct. 552, 83 L.Ed.2d 439 (1984), the defendant made a voluntary election to represent himself in the penal…
• Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1980)
  …row in the years since Gregg,8 only three persons have been executed.9 Two of them made no effort to challenge their sentence and were thus permitted to commit what I have elsewhere described as “state-administered suicide." Lenhard [*440] v. Wolff, 444 U. S. 807, 815 (1979) (dissenting opinion). See also Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U. S. 1012 (1976). The task of eliminating arbitrariness in the infliction of capital punishment is proving to be one which our criminal justice system— and perhaps any criminal jus…
• Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (U.S. 1990)
  …n in the context of applications for stays of executions filed by parties other than the defendants. Three times the Court denied the applications. See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U. S. 1012 (1976); Evans v. Bennett, 440 U. S. 987 (1979); Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U. S. 807 (1979). In Gilmore, the Court stated only that the competent defendant had knowingly and intelligently waived any federal rights. 429 U. S., at 1013. In Evans, then-JusTiCE Rehnquist, in his capacity as Circuit Justice, stayed the execution pendin…

  ← 1 / 2 →