ILLINOIS

v.

VITALE

Citator

Cited By

• Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)
  …endants had affected his judgment that Sullivan should not present a defense. To give weight to DiBona’s contrary testimony, the court held, “would be to . . . require a showing of actual prejudice.” 593 F. 2d, at 522.4 [*341] We granted certiorari, 444 U. S. 823 (1979), to consider recurring issues left unresolved by Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U. S. 475 (1978). We now vacate and remand. II At the outset, we must consider whether the Court of Appeals exceeded the proper scope of review when it rejected the…
• Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 (U.S. 1980)
  …judgment was based upon federal or state constitutional-grounds. 439 U. S. 974 (1978). After the Supreme Court of Illinois, on remand, certified that its judgment was based upon federal constitutional grounds, we again granted a writ of certiorari. 444 U.S. 823 (1979). The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” This constitutional guarantee is applicable to the States through the Due Process…
• Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 446 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1980)
  …ct the entry of final judgment as to fewer than all of the claims or parties; to do so, the court must make an express determination that there is no just reason for delay. We granted certiorari in order to examine the use of this procedural device. 444 U. S. 823 (1979). I From 1968 to 1972, respondent General Electric Co. entered into a series of 21 contracts with petitioner Curtiss-Wright Corp. for the manufacture of components designed for use in nuclear powered naval vessels. These contracts had a tota…