STOVALL ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (96 total)

• United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …e reversed because it is inconsistent with the verdicts on the others. We do not agree. A similar argument was rejected in United States v. Dubea, 612 F. 2d 950 (5th Cir. 1980), and in United States v. Michel, 588 F. 2d 986 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825, 100 S.Ct. 47, 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979). Our inquiry on appeal is limited to determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support the counts on which the appellant was convicted; we do not look at what the jury did with other counts or other defe…
• United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …inal enterprise. United States v. Lurz, 666 F. 2d at 78; compare United States v. Gomberg, 715 F. 2d 843, 850 n. 4 (3d Cir.1983) (unnecessary to reach the question); United States v. Michel, 588 F. 2d 986, 1000 n. 15 (5th Cir.) (same), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 825, 100 S.Ct. 47, 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1975). On a number of occasions, this court has affirmed § 848 convictions where the government apparently did not indict the defendant on three of the eligible predicate felonies in addition to the § 848 count, e.g., U…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Russell, 703 F.2d 1243 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …02 S.Ct. 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982). We conclude that the trial judge correctly allowed the jury, under proper instruction, to determine whether one or more conspiracies existed. United States v. Michel, 588 F. 2d 986, 995 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825, 100 S.Ct. 47, 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979) (“Whether a scheme is one conspiracy or several is primarily a question for the jury”); United States v. Rodriguez, 509 F. 2d 1342, 1348 (5th Cir.1975). II. Russell and Dixon argue that the trial court erred in…