MILL

v.

ALASKA

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Maugeri v. State, 460 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …tement); Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 300, 93 S.Ct. 1038, 1048, 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973) (same); United States v. Mock, 640 F. 2d 629 (5th Cir.l981)(statement to former wife); United States v. Goins, 593 F. 2d 88 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827, 100 S.Ct. 52, 62 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979) (statement to daughter); United States v. Bagley, 537 F. 2d 162, 165 (5th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1075, 97 S.Ct. 816, 50 L.Ed.2d 794 (1977) (statement to cellmates); United States v. Bar [*979] rett, 539…
• Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …y improper; with this opinion we put counsel in this Circuit on clear notice of the impropriety of engaging in conversation with excused jurors during trial. . For example, in United States v. Winkle, 587 F. 2d 705, 713-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827, 100 S.Ct. 51, 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979), a juror apparently found out that a co-defendant had pleaded guilty and disclosed this information to other jurors. . See Washington Times Co. v. Bonner, 86 F. 2d 836, 848 (D.C.Cir.1936). . Defendants challenge…
• United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …nts’ first claim is merit-less. The law in this Circuit is well settled that the defendant bears the burden of establishing that an extrinsic contact with a jury in fact occurred. United States v. Winkle, 587 F. 2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827, 100 S.Ct. 51, 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979). Once the defendant has proved extrinsic contact, the burden then shifts to the government to demonstrate that the contact was not prejudicial. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 999 (5th Cir.1981), cert. d…