SOLOMON

v.

WEST VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (U.S. 1990)
  …of Appeals to have considered the question, that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches conducted by the United States Government against United States citizens abroad. See, e. g., United States v. Conroy, 589 F. 2d 1258, 1264 (CA5), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 831 (1979); United States v. Rose, 570 F. 2d 1358, 1362 (CA9 1978). A warrantless, unreasonable search and seizure is no less a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it occurs in Mexicali, Mexico, rather than Calexico, California. President John…
• United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …d 1120, 1124 (2d Cir. 1974) (emphasis added)). All that is necessary is that the person “be aware of the essential nature and scope of the enterprise and intend to participate.” United States v. Conroy, 589 F. 2d 1258, 1269 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831, 100 S.Ct. 60, 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F. 2d 367, 404 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2020, 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). By their own admissions the inspectors knew of and participated in more than one tr…
• United States v. Ghassan L. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …ubstance was heroin. It was not obliged to instruct the jury with regard to hypothetical possibilities when there was no basis in the evidence to support such possibilities. See United States v. Conroy, 589 F. 2d 1258, 1273 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831, 100 S.Ct. 60, 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979). Indeed, in his closing argument, Stillman’s attorney attacked the data obtained by the government’s chemists, but expressly stated, “Let us be certain of what we understand. I am not at this point arguing to the…