IN RE SCHULMAN

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Merrill Lynch v. Curran, 456 U.S. 353 (U.S. 1982)
  …federal regulation, see infra, at 360-367. H. R. Rep. No. 93-975, p. 1 (1974) (hereinafter House Report). 622 F. 2d 216 (1980). Accord, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F. 2d 129, 133, n. 7 (CA8) (dictum), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 838 (1979); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F. 2d 96, 103, n. 8 (CA7 1977). See also Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co., 586 F. 2d 1352, 1355 (CA10 1978) (assuming that a private right of action exists). Leist v. Simplot,…
• United States v. Gwaltney, 790 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …terms at the time of the incident, for a reckless disregard for a person’s constitutional rights is evidence of specific intent to deprive that person of those rights.” See e.g., United States v. Ellis, 595 F. 2d 154, 161-62 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838, 100 S.Ct. 75, 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979). (2) The use of an example of conduct engaged in under color of law neither usurped the function of the jury nor suggested that one who wears a uniform and carries a firearm necessarily acts under color of law. Th…
• Curran v. Merrill Lynch, 622 F.2d 216 (6th Cir. 1980)
  …sel to another for a commission, even when done by way of a discretionary commodities account, does not amount to a common enterprise.” Id. at 462. . See also Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Goldman, 593 F. 2d 129 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838, 100 S.Ct. 76 (1979); Moody v. Bache & Co., 570 F. 2d 523 (5th Cir. 1978); Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F. 2d 132 (8th Cir. 1970) (without explanation the court found a cause of action lies for churning a commodities account under t…