SMYER ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …nfidence (A319-21, A3503-05). Eisenberg’s access to privileged information is conclusively presumed. See, e. g., United States v. Kitchin, 592 F. 2d 900, 904 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (adopting district court’s findings and conclusions), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843, 100 S.Ct. 86, 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); cf. American Roller Co. v. Budinger, 513 F. 3d 982, 984 (3d Cir. 1975) (civil case); Arkansas v. Dean Foods Products Co., 605 F. 2d 380, 384-85 (8th Cir. 1979) (antitrust case). This court has held that counsel c…
• United States v. Aulet, 618 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ual method of challenging the effectiveness of defense counsel in a federal criminal trial is by a collateral attack on the conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See, e. g., United [*186] States v. Schreiber, 599 F. 2d 534, 538 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843, 100 S.Ct. 86, 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1979); United States v. Rodriquez, 582 F. 2d 1015, 1016 (5th Cir. 1978) (per curiam); United States v. Kazni, 576 F. 2d 238, 242 (9th Cir. 1978). When this path is taken, the district judge can, in an app…
• Birt v. Montgomery, 725 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …1982) (trial court disqualification of the defendant’s counsel of choice because counsel had prior knowledge of crime held not to violate defendant’s right to counsel of choice); United States v. Kitchin, 592 F. 2d 900, 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843, 100 S.Ct. 86, 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979) (upholding dismissal of defendant’s counsel for conflict of interest and stating that “a defendant’s right to counsel of choice is not absolute and must yield to the higher interest of the effective administration…