ROBERT M. BRAKE, APPELLANT,
v.
DON SHOEMAKER, THE MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND FRED SHERMAN, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-03-19
No. 67-661
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
208 So. 2d 107 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's dismissal of a libel action, holding that the complaint failed to state a cause of action under the standards established by the Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.


Holding

No, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for libel because it did not meet the constitutional standards required for such claims.


Key Quotes

“In this action for libel the trial court first denied a motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.”

Describes the initial procedural posture of the case.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a libel action against the defendants. The trial court initially denied a motion to dismiss but later granted the defendants' rene…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for libel the trial court first denied a motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Thereafter the defendants answered and moved for summary judgment, and the plaintiff moved for summary judgment as to liability. These motions were supported and opposed respectively by evidentiary matter. After hearing but prior to a ruling thereon the pleadings were amended, and defendants renewed their motion to dismiss. Thereupon the trial court entered the order from which the plaintiff now appeals, denying the motions for summary judgment, granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and dismissing the cause. On consideration of the record and briefs, we affirm on authority of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686. See also Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brake v. Shoemaker, 214 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 1968)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 208 So. 2d 107.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw