EBENHART

v.

HELLER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. DiFRANCESCO, 449 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1980)
  …1000 (1964). There are other situations where probation or parole may be revoked and sentence of imprisonment imposed. See, e. g., United States v. Kuck, 573 F. 2d 25 (CA10 1978); United States v. Walden, 578 F. 2d 966, 972 (CA3 1978), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 849 (1979); United States v. Jones, 540 F. 2d 465 (CA10 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1101 (1977).; Dunn v. United States, 182 U. S. App. D. C. 261, 561 F. 2d 259 (1977). While these criminal sanctions do not involve the increase of a final sentence, a…
• Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1983)
  …ment to remain in a prison in his home State. See Beshaw v. Fenton, 635 F. 2d 239, 246-247 (CA3 1980), cert. denied, 453 U. S. 912 (1981); Cofone v. Manson, 594 F. 2d 934, 937, n. 4 (CA2 1979); Sisbarro v. Warden, 592 F. 2d 1, 3 (CA1), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 849 (1979); Fletcher v. Warden, 467 F. Supp. 777, 779-780 (Kan. 1979); Curry-Bey v. Jackson, 422 F. Supp. 926, 931-933 (DC 1976); McDonnell v. United States Attorney General, 420 F. Supp. 217, 220 (ED Ill. 1976); Goodnow v. Perrin, 120 N. H. 669, 671, 4…
• United States v. Ghassan L. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …ted or approved” by the agent and hence fall within the Jencks Act. United States v. Walden, 578 F. 2d 966, 970 (3d Cir.1978) (Walden I), on remand, 465 F.Supp. 255 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d, 590 F. 2d 85 (3d Cir.) (Walden II) (per curiam), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 849, 100 S.Ct. 99, 62 L.Ed.2d 64 (1979).18 Although in most cases a rough draft may not be a Jencks Act “statement,” we believe the same rationale which underlay our decision in Vella directing retention of rough notes is also applicable to handwritten…

  ← 1 / 2 →