ELMORE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ghassan L. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …, and statements which are directed to that purpose must be considered to be in furtherance of the conspiracy. See United States v. Fortes, 619 F. 2d 108, 117 (1st Cir.1980); United States v. Hickey, 596 F. 2d 1082, 1089-90 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 853, 100 S.Ct. 107, 62 L.Ed.2d 70 (1979); United States v. Patton, 594 F. 2d 444, 447 (5th Cir.1979).12 C. DURING THE COURSE OF THE CONSPIRACY Appellants contend that the conspiracy charged in the indictment terminated with the arrest of Ghassan, Wel…
• United States v. Brandon, 633 F.2d 773 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …ttal on the remaining count as matter of law. But in any event, it is not required that verdicts be consistent even when a conviction is rationally incompatible with an acquittal. United States v. Green, 594 F. 2d 1227, 1230 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 444 U.S. 853, 100 S.Ct. 108, 62 L.Ed.2d 70 (1979); United States v. Miller, 546 F. 2d 320, 325 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Garcia, 527 F. 2d 473, 474 (9th Cir. 1975). See also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 101, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2899, 41 L.Ed.2d 590…
• United States v. Luce, 713 F.2d 1236 (6th Cir. 1983)
  …the First Circuit has held that a ruling in limine that a defendant could be impeached with prior inconsistent statements is reviewable despite the defendant’s failure to testify. United States v. Hickey, 596 F. 2d 1082 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 853, 100 S.Ct. 107, 62 L.Ed.2d 70 (1979). Decisions in several other circuits have reached the merits of the trial court’s ruling without discussing reviewability. E.g., United States v. Provenzano, 620 F. 2d 985 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 8…