NANCY HEATH, APPELLANT,
v.
DR. SAUL MILLER AND HELEN MILLER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
NANCY HEATH, APPELLANT,
DR. SAUL MILLER AND HELEN MILLER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
208 So. 2d 129
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Garring v. King Cole Northshore Hotel, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 207; Colton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Fla.App.1962, 136 So.2d 361; North Shore Hospital v. Barber, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 849; Gordon v. Vaughan, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 474.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A-1 Truck Rentals, Inc. v. Vilberg, 222 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…the present appeal from it is properly an interlocutory appeal. As such it is not subject to dismissal for failure to appeal from a prior interlocutory order. The motion to dismiss is denied. . Larybai’, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App.1968,- 208 So. 2d 129. . Ibid. . Cf. State ex rel. Park Towers Associates, Ltd. v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, Fla.1969, 221 So. 2d 136. . See Alabama Hotel Co. v. J. L. Mott Iron Works, 86 Fla. 608, 98 So. 825 (1924) ; North Shore Hospital, I…
-
Bernard v. Rose, 68 So. 3d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…the rule explicitly notes the requirement that a motion for reinstatement “must be served within one month after the order of dismissal.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420, Author’s Comment ¶ 9 (original emphasis); see also Larybar, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 208 So. 2d 129, 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). A trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a cause where the motion to reinstate the cause was not filed within one month of the dismissal. See Wilds v. Permenter, 228 So. 2d 408, 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969) (holding t…
-
State v. Armstrong, 312 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…r being filed by the clerk. This court has held that recordation may delay the time for the commencement of further action (i. e., a petition for reinstatement), where such recording was required. Larybar, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App.1968, 208 So. 2d 129. In the in [*510] stant cases, however, there exist no requirements that the orders be recorded.1 The orders appealed are not required to be recorded by any provision of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and none of the files contains a written order…
Authorities Cited
- N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962)
- Gordon v. Vaughan, 193 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Garring v. King Cole Northshore Hotel, Inc., 122 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)
- Colton v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc., 136 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)