WATKINS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (93 total)

• Barber v. State, 413 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
  …Other federal circuits have followed this interpretation of rule 609. United States v. Smith, 623 F. 2d 627 (9th Cir. 1980); United States v. Vanderbosch, 610 F. 2d 95 (2d Cir. 1979); United States v. Duncan, 598 F. 2d 839 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871, 100 S.Ct. 148, 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979); United States v. Rose, 526 F. 2d 745 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905, 96 S.Ct. 1497, 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976). While section 90.610 of the Florida Evidence Code is not the same as rule 609 in all partic…
• Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025 (U.S. 1984)
  …62, 653 F. 2d 609, 617 (1981) (“[V]oir dire has long been recognized as an effective method of rooting out such bias, especially when conducted in a careful and thoroughgoing manner”); United States v. Duncan, 598 F. 2d 839, 865 (CA4), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 871 (1979); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F. 2d 184, 209, n. 45 (CA5 1975) (en banc) (citing cases), cert, denied sub nom. Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U. S. 911 (1976). But cf. Smith v. Phillips, 455 U. S. 209, 222, and n. (1982) (O’CONNOR, J., concurring) (descri…
• United States v. Dudley Lee Berry, 670 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …hat there could be no stops of individuals at airports without reasonable suspicion, preceded Elmore, but diverging decisions have continued subsequently. Although the Government in United States v. Roundtree, 596 F. 2d 672 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871, 100 S.Ct. 149, 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979), never argued that the airport stop at issue was not a seizure, the panel’s ruling in that case that the only issue was whether the initial investigatory stop was based on reasonable suspicion brought into questi…