LEWIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1984)
  …pp. 2d 9, 12-13, 49 Cal. Rptr. 146, 148 (1966); and State v. Lekas, 201 Kan. 579, 582-584, 442 P. 2d 11, 15-16 (1968), with, e. g., United States v. Miller, 643 F. 2d 713, 715 (CA10 1981); United States v. Holmes, 594 F. 2d 1167 (CA8), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 873 (1979); Nettles v. State, 248 So. 2d 259, 260 (Fla. App. 1971); [*426] Connell v. State, 131 Ga. App. 213, 205 S. E. 2d 513, 514 (1974); State v. Hartman, 281 N. W. 2d 639, 643-644 (Iowa App. 1979); and People v. Parker, 101 Misc. 2d 800, 802-804, 4…
• United States v. Disla, 805 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …remaining theories. a. Possession Possession of a controlled substance under section 841(a)(1) “may be constructive, as well as actual.” United States v. Grayson, 597 F. 2d 1225, 1229 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., MacGregor v. United States, 444 U.S. 873, 100 S.Ct. 153, 62 L.Ed.2d 99 (1979); United States v. Morando-Alvarez, 520 F. 2d 882, 884 (9th Cir.1975). The term “constructive possession” does not connote a legal fiction. Rather, the term simply reflects the common sense notion that an indivi…
• United States v. Oliver, 683 F.2d 224 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …shed that specific intent or knowledge of the defendant that he is violating the law is not an essential element for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h) or 18 U.S.C. app. § 1202(a). See United States v. Holmes, 594 F. 2d 1167 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 873, 100 S.Ct. 154, 62 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979); United States v. Houston, 547 F. 2d 104 (9th Cir. 1976). Instead, the “courts have consistently held that a defendant need only be shown to have knowingly received or possessed the firearm.” United States v. Su…