KLEIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Green, 648 F.2d 587 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …[*595] A witness may, of course, be cross-examined about matters which he has put in dispute. See Brown v. United States, supra, 356 U.S. at 154-55, 78 S.Ct. at 626-27. See also United States v. Panza, 612 F. 2d 432, 437 (9 Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3019, 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980). An opening statement, however, having no evidentiary value, cannot operate to place an issue in controversy. See United States v. McLister, 608 F. 2d 785, 790 (9 Cir. 1979), citing United States v. Tomaiolo…
• First Am. Title Co. OF S.D. & First Am. Title Ins. Co. of S.D. v. S.D. Land Title Ass'n, 714 F.2d 1439 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …State Bar of Arizona, 686 F. 2d 692 (9th Cir.1981), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2084, 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983); United States v. Texas State Board of Accountancy, 464 F.Supp. 400 (W.D.Tex. 1978), modified, 592 F. 2d 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 262, 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979). Our above discussion should indicate, however, that we are in fundamental disagreement with our brethren in these circuits regarding application of the state action doctrine to state agencies or subdivisions. I…
• Monroe v. Thigpen, 932 F.2d 1437 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …that there were genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. .Monroe asserts that the Fourth Circuit has recognized a due process right to be fairly considered for parole. See Paine v. Baker, 595 F. 2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 263, 62 L.Ed.2d 181 (1979). In Paine, the Fourth Circuit held that a prisoner has a due process right to have prejudicial information deleted from prison files if the following elements are proven: (1) specific information exists in the p…