SKOKO ET AL., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON

v.

ANDRUS, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Perez v. State, 639 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …a holding that (1) the defendant was properly identified in court as the person observed by police in possession of a firearm, when such defendant was a convicted felon, see United States v. Kleinschmidt, 596 F. 2d 133, 136 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 927, 100 S.Ct. 267, 62 L.Ed.2d 184 (1979); Ivester v. State, 398 So. 2d 926, 928-29 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 470 (Fla.1982); (2) the comment made by the prosecuting attorney in final argument to the jury constituted, in context, a co…
• LOS Angeles Mem'l Coliseum Comm'n v. Nat'l Football League, 726 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …, 377 U.S. 993, 84 S.Ct. 1920, 12 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1964). Also, a party is entitled to have theories supported by the evidence presented to the jury. Reno-West Coast Distribution Co., Inc. v. Mead Corp., 613 F. 2d 722, 725-726 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 927,100 S.Ct. 267, 62 L.Ed.2d 183 (1979). The theory, of course, must have legal as well as factual support; if what is proposed is incorrect the court is not required to recast it in order to ensure the party’s exact theory is before the jury, so long…
• Pushkin v. The Regents OF the Univ. OF Colo., 658 F.2d 1372 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …ssary to address these issues [including whether a private right of action was provided by the Act] and we express no views on them.” 442 U.S. 405, n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 2366, n. 5. This court in Coleman v. Darden, 595 F. 2d 533 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 927, 100 S.Ct. 267, 62 L.Ed.2d 184 (1979), recognized that a private right of action may have been created by § 504. Every court of appeals and district court, and there have been many, which have considered this question have held that a private right…

  ← 1 / 2 →