STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HARDRIVES COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES
STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
HARDRIVES COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES
208 So. 2d 462
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the parties having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stack v. Okaloosa Cnty., 347 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…criptive easement. The grant of prescriptive easement was error. As to the order entered after the notice of appeal had been filed, it was entered after the trial court had lost jurisdiction of the cause and was therefore a nullity. Smith v. State, 208 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1 DCA 1968). This being an appeal in an eminent domain action, appellants’ attorney’s motion for the allowance of a reasonable attorney’s fee for the prosecution of these appeals is granted, and upon remand it is directed that the trial court…