KINSEY, EXECUTRIX

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …able only after the defendant has been permitted sufficient cross-examination to satisfy the Sixth Amendment. United States v. Summers, 598 F. 2d 450, 459-61 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Vasilios, 598 F. 2d 387, 389-91 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 932, 967, 100 S.Ct. 277, 456, 62 L.Ed.2d 190, 380 (1979). In both instances complained of there was more than sufficient opportunity for the defendants to examine the government’s witness, thus relegating our role to one of determining whether the tria…
• John H. Harland Co. v. Clarke Checks, Inc., 711 F.2d 966 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …k limited the scope of the protection to be accorded plaintiff’s mark); Armstrong Cork Co. v. World Carpets, Inc., 597 F. 2d 496, 505 (5th Cir.) (extensive third-party uses of the mark “World” suggested that there was no infringement), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 932,100 S.Ct. 277, 62 L.Ed.2d 190 (1979); Restatement of Torts § 729, Comment (g), at 596 (1938) (“The greater the number of identical or more or less similar trade-marks already in use ... the less is the likelihood of confusion.”). Harland points ou…
• United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha Xheka, 704 F.2d 974 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …we agree. The Federal Rules of Evidence allow a party to impeach its own witness, and permit that it be done through the introduction of extrinsic evidence. Fed.R.Evid. 607, 613; United States v. Inendino, 604 F. 2d 458 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 932, 100 S.Ct. 276, 62 L.Ed.2d 190. Island's grand jury testimony was properly admitted as substantive evidence. Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(A); see also United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co., 598 F. 2d 1101, 1108 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied,…