CORAL CONSTRUCTION CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
LEATHA FLEEMAN ARLT, T. A. BUCHANAN, AS SHERIFF OF METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, AND THEODORE WILISCH, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment because the plaintiff met their burden of proof with competent, substantial evidence.
Following prior supreme court and appellate decisions, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appealed, arguing t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Substantial Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
Following the decision of the supreme court, reported in Arlt v. Buchanan, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 575, and this court’s mandate in response thereto, reported in Coral Construction Corp. v. Arlt, Fla.App. 1966, 191 So.2d 94, this cause came on for final hearing before the circuit judge and resulted in the entry of a judgment or decree in favor of the plaintiff in the trial court.
The defendant appeals and contends that the final judgment or decree under review is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. An examination of the record indicates that the plaintiff in the trial court carried her burden of proof in support of the cause of action pleaded and approved by the supreme court in Arlt v. Buchanan, supra.
Therefore, there being such in the record, this court is required to affirm the ruling of the circuit judge. Miami Beach First National Bank v. Shalleck, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 649; Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 740; Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Company, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 679.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Leatha Fleeman Arlt v. Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1966)
- Getsie v. State, 193 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)
- Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank & Gladys Schutz v. Shalleck, 182 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Daniels v. Lake Pleasant Land Co., Inc., 193 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
- Coral Constr. Corp. v. Death a Fleeman Arlt, 191 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Goldstein v. Pettinger, 183 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- The Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank v. Hare, 183 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)