ROBINSON

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Crues v. KFC Corp., 729 F.2d 1145 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …the “benefit of the bargain” measure, i.e., the difference between the actual value of the property and what its value would have been if it had been as represented. Fong v. Town & Country Estates, Inc., 600 F. 2d 179, 182 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 298, 62 L.Ed.2d 309 (1979); Auffenberg v. Hafley, 457 S.W. 2d 929, 937 (Mo.App.1970). KFC contends that Crues failed to prove either end of the “benefit of the bargain” measure. Nunn testified, however, that the actual value of the fran…
• Russ' Kwik CAR Wash, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Co., 772 F.2d 214 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …t instance by the District Court. . The Supreme Court in Copperweld did not consider the applicability of its holding to the Robinson-Patman Act. The Fifth Circuit in Security Tire & Rubber Co. v. Gates, 598 F. 2d 962, 965 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 298, 62 L.Ed.2d 309 (1979), expressly distinguished "the rather remote question whether a partially-owned subsidiary corporation could conspire with its parent corporation in violation of the Sherman Act.” . A purchaser may be held liabl…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• City OF MT. Pleasant v. Associated Elec. Coop., Inc., 838 F.2d 268 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …he price-discrimination claim, the Court ruled that the cooperatives cannot make “sales” among themselves for purposes of the Robinson-Patman Act, relying on Security Tire & Rubber Co. v. Gates Rubber Co., 598 F. 2d 962 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 942, 100 S.Ct. 298, 62 L.Ed.2d 309 (1979). On the two monopoly claims, the Court held that the City could not, as a matter of law, prove that defendants monopolized the market for wholesale electricity because it admitted that, whenever its wholesale-su…

  ← 1 / 2 →