ORIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Canals-Jimenez, 943 F.2d 1284 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …l vagueness, there has been appellate review of cases in which defendants were convicted of being “found in” the United States, including authority controlling in this Court. See, e.g., United States v. Oris, 598 F. 2d 428 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 945, 100 S.Ct. 304, 62 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979); United States v. Gonzalez-Sandoval, 894 F. 2d 1043 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Anton, 888 F. 2d 53 (7th Cir.1989). In none of these cases did the court deem the issue of vagueness important enough to addr…
• United States v. Terrazas-Carrasco, 861 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …as mere dictum. See United States v. Campos Asencio, 822 F. 2d 506, 508 n. 1 (5th Cir.1987). However, we need not decide this issue in determining that there was no plain error. In United States v. Oris, 598 F. 2d 428, 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 945, 100 S.Ct. 304, 62 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979), we held that the charge that a defendant was “unlawfully present” in the United States with a specific intent to disobey the law, by definition, requires a finding that there was no Attorney General consent, wh…
• United States v. Campos-Asencio, 822 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …85, 789 (9th Cir.1968). This Court has also held that an unobjected-to failure to mention lack-of-consent specifically in jury instructions did not rise to the level of plain error. United States v. Oris, 598 F. 2d 428, 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 945, 100 S.Ct. 304, 62 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979). . The Government states that Campos conceded that he was informed of his right to hire a lawyer. However, Campos’ counsel stated oi.ly that Campos lacked the money to employ a lawyer at the earlier deportation…