ARNALL, GOLDEN & GREGORY ET AL.

v.

SMITH, COHEN, RINGEL, KOHLER & MARTIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Washington v. Watkins, 655 F.2d 1346 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …rgument that thus far has been accepted by only one of the Court’s nine Justices, and that at best would have left his client in prison for life without possibility of parole. . The State cites Warren v. State, 369 So. 2d 483 (Miss.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 956, 100 S.Ct. 436, 62 L.Ed.2d 328 (1979); Evans v. State, 315 So. 2d 1 (Miss. 1975); and Rayburn v. State, 312 So. 2d 454 (Miss. 1975), as support for the proposition that under Mississippi law, specific objections to jury instructions must be made at…
• Duncan v. Merrill Lynch, 646 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …lateral order test set forth in Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, supra, 437 U.S. at 468, 98 S.Ct. at 2457, which restated the Cohen requirements. . In North American Acceptance Corp. v. Arnall, Golden & Gregory, 593 F. 2d 642 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 956, 100 S.Ct. 436, 62 L.Ed.2d 328 (1979), this court held that an order denying a motion to disqualify class counsel is not immediately appealable under § 1291. Merrill Lynch argues that under the principles announced in Arnall, an order granting a mot…
• Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., 684 F.2d 324 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …issues could not be separately decided, there could be no separate final order for purposes of § 1291 on the intertwined disqualification issue. In North American Acceptance Corp. v. Arnall, Golden & Gregory, 593 F. 2d 642 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 956, 100 S.Ct. 436, 62 L.Ed.2d 328 (1979), we also determined that the denial of a motion to disqualify counsel within the class action context was not appealable because it was not conclusive or effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.…