UNITED STATES
v.
MENDENHALL
UNITED STATES
MENDENHALL
444 U.S. 960
Supreme Court of the United States (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ROE v. Casey, 623 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1980)…vitably require the adjudication of serious questions concerning the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment. See, e. g., Zbaraz v. Quern, 469 F.Supp. 1212 (N.D.Ill.1979), further consideration of jurisdiction postponed until argument on the merits, 444 U.S. 960, 100 S.Ct. 444, 62 L.Ed.2d 373 (1979); McRae v. Califano, 491 F.Supp. 630 (E.D.N.Y.1980), application for stay of the judgment denied and prob. juris. noted, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1010, 62 L.Ed.2d 749 (1980). It is a well established rule that needl…1 / 3