LACLEDE GAS CO.

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• Dorsey v. State, 402 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1981)
  …s, the appellants had full knowledge of the specific facts justifying the charge in the information. Dorsey argues that the information must be written so as to avoid double jeopardy. United States v. Cuesta, 597 F. 2d 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964, 100 S.Ct. 451, 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979). Determining exactly what offenses for which jeopardy has attached under a RICO prosecution may be difficult in some cases, but clearly in this case jeopardy has attached for any racketeering charge, brought und…
• United States v. Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …y in a substantive count. See, e.g., Wong Tai v. United States, 273 U.S. 77, 81, 47 S.Ct. 300, 301, 71 L.Ed. 545 (1927); United States v. Clark, 649 F. 2d 534, 539 (7th Cir.1981); United States v. Cuesta, 597 F. 2d 903, 917 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964, 100 S.Ct. 451, 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979). Appellant does not claim to have been misled at any time as to what proceeding allegedly was obstructed. The ambiguity arises because the overt acts listed refer to both the Grand Jury and the FBI investigati…
• Davis & COX v. Summa Corp., 751 F.2d 1507 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …the form of a summary. The purpose of the rule is to allow the use of summaries when the documents are unmanageable or when the summaries would be useful to the judge and jury. United States v. Johnson, 594 F. 2d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964, 100 S.Ct. 451, 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979). Summaries must “fairly represent” the underlying documents. See Gordon v. United States, 438 F. 2d 858, 876 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 828, 92 S.Ct. 63, 30 L.Ed.2d 56 (1971). The admission of summaries…