BROCKETT, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF SPOKANE COUNTY

v.

SPOKANE ARCADES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Rubano v. Dep't OF Transp., 656 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 1995)
  …§ 6(a), Fla. Const.; see also Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp., 371 So. 2d 663, 669 (Fla.) (holding that Florida Constitution bars the taking of private property except for public use, and then only after full compensation), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 965, 100 S.Ct. 453, 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979). Further, where a government agency, by its conduct or activities, has effectively taken private property without a formal exercise of the power of eminent domain, a cause of action for inverse condemnation will…
• Schick v. Fla. Dep't OF Agric., 504 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …wells. The Florida Constitution bars the taking of private property except for public use, and then only after full compensation. Art. X, s. 6, Fla. Const.; Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corporation, 371 So. 2d 663, 669 (Fla.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 965, 100 S.Ct. 453, 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979). Thus, a cause of action for inverse condemnation will lie against a government agency, which by its conduct or activities, has taken private property without a formal exercise of the power of eminent domain. Pi…
• Westland Skating Ctr., Inc. v. GUS MacHado Buick, Inc., 542 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1989)
  …increases the natural flow. . This Court has previously recognized that subject to legislative regulation, the reasonable use rule is applicable to subsurface waters. Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp., 371 So. 2d 663 (Fla.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 965, 100 S.Ct. 453, 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979). . The persuasiveness of Westland's compliance with the code may depend, in part, upon the extent to which the code seeks to protect others from being damaged by surface waters caused through the construction o…