HOLLOWAY

v.

TIMES MIRROR PRESS CO.

Citator

Cited By

• LEE v. City OF Peoria, 685 F.2d 196 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …his rule when successful prosecution of the second action would nullify the initial judgment or would impair rights established in the initial action. Id. § 22(2)(b); Martino v. McDonald’s System, Inc., 598 F. 2d 1079, 1085 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 455, 62 L.Ed.2d 379 (1979); see also Billingsley v. Seibels, 556 F. 2d 276 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 929, 98 S.Ct. 1499, 55 L.Ed.2d 524 (1978) (affirming a district court decision which applied res judicata to bar a section…
• The Cnty. OF Cook v. Midcon Corp., 773 F.2d 892 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …ent or would impair rights established in the initial action." Restatement of Judgments, § 22(2) (b) and comment f; Lee v. City of Peoria, 685 F. 2d 196, 201 (7th Cir.1983); Martino v. McDonalds System, Inc., 598 F. 2d 1079 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 455, 62 L.Ed.2d 379 (1979). We believe the rationale of the exception noted in the Restatement and recognized in Lee and Martino is fully applicable to the state claims urged here which, as the district [*909] court noted, in many respe…
• Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 808 F.2d 1228 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …is not the only basis for the doctrine of res judicata. Res judicata also preserves the integrity of judgments and protects those who rely on them. Id. (quoting Martino v. McDonald’s System, Inc., 598 F. 2d 1079, 1085 (7th Cir.), certiorari denied, 444 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 455, 62 L.Ed.2d 379 (1979)). For purposes of determining the res judicata effect of a judgment, a “cause of action” is not limited to those issues that were or might have been offered to sustain the claim; it is also deemed to comprise a…

  ← 1 / 2 →