ESTATE OF W. T. GRANT CO.

v.

LEWIS, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jent v. State, 408 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1981)
  …esence of cameras in a courtroom to constitute a per se denial of due process. Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560, 101 S.Ct. 802, 66 L.Ed.2d 740 (1981); In Re Petition of Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc., 370 So. 2d 764 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 976, 100 S.Ct. 476, 62 L.Ed.2d 403 (1979). In order to have cameras excluded from a courtroom during trial, a defendant must show prejudice of constitutional dimensions. Compare Clark v. State, 379 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 936, 101 S…
• Fla. Exp. Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Dep't OF Revenue & Gerald Lewis, 510 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …spute relating to a tax refund. The only ease cited in the majority’s opinion concerning an application for a tax refund is Estate of W.T. Grant Co. v. Lewis, 358 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), affirmed, 370 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1979), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 976, 100 S.Ct. 476, 62 L.Ed.2d 403 (1979), wherein this court held that it properly had jurisdiction over a direct appeal of an administrative order denying a sales tax refund, despite the fact that the basis for the taxpayer’s request for a refund was…
• Furey v. City OF Sacramento, 780 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …led either to be relieved from the application of the Open Space ordinance or to be refunded the amount of his sewer assessment. See Fu-rey v. City of Sacramento, 24 Cal.3d 862, 875-76, 157 Cal.Rptr. 684, 691-92, 598 P. 2d 844, 851-52, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 976, 100 S.Ct. 476, 62 L.Ed.2d 403 (1979). In a footnote, however, the court stated that this case is “[t]o be distinguished [from] cases in which the construction of public improvements is undertaken on the initiative of the property owner himself, […

  ← 1 / 2 →