ANDRUS, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

v.

SHELL OIL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bryant v. Yellen, 447 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1980)
  …strative practice over the years did not bar application of the limitation to the Valley. Because of the importance of these cases, we granted the petitions for writs of certiorari filed by the District, the landowners, and the State of California. 444 U. S. 978 (1979). II As a preliminary matter, we agree with the Court of Appeals that the respondents who sought to enter the suit when the United States forwent an appeal from the District Court’s adverse decision had standing to intervene and press the ap…
• Roy and Josie Fisher v. Tucson Sch. Dist. No. ONE, 625 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …appealable interest.’ . Resolution of this question turns on traditional standing analysis.” United States v. Imperial Irrigation District, 559 F. 2d 509, 521 (9th Cir. 1977), modified on other grounds, 595 F. 2d 524 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 444 U.S. 978, 100 S.Ct. 479, 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979) (citations omitted). . Only the Phase II modifications are at issue here. The Suttons did not appeal the August 31, 1978 approval of the original stipulation of settlement.…