BENEFIELD

v.

FLORDIA

Citator

Cited By (115 total)

• Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1980)
  …ety Commission pursuant tó a request under the Freedom of Information Act. We granted certiorari to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit because of the importance of the question and because of a conflict in the Circuits.1 444 U. S. 979. I In 1972, Congress enacted the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 86 Stat. 1207, 15 U. S. C. § 2051 et seq., in order, •inter alia, “to protect the public against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products” and “to assist c…
• McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (U.S. 1984)
  …rotection of the right throughout the trial, must be considered capable of differentiating the claims presented by a pro se defendant from those presented by standby counsel. Cf. United States v. Martinez, 597 F. 2d 509, 510-511 (CA5), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 979 (1979); United States v. Penick, 496 F. 2d 1105, 1108 (CA7), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 897 (1974); United States v. Reeves, 348 F. 2d 469 (CA2 1965), cert. denied, 383 U. S. 929 (1966). Accordingly, the appearance of a pro se defendant’s self-represen…
• Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (U.S. 1990)
  …7); United States v. Baugus, 761 F. 2d 506, 508 (CA8 1985); United States v. Mock, 640 F. 2d 629, 631, n. 1 (CA5 [*351] 1981); United States v. Hewitt, 663 F. 2d 1381, 1387 (CA11 1981); United States v. Lasky, 600 F. 2d 765, 769 (CA9), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 979 (1979). We see no reason to depart from the majority rule in this case.3 The only clue to the issues in the earlier case was a discussion between the prosecutor, Dowling’s attorney, and the District Judge that took place during the District Court’s…