CROSS

v.

JARVIS, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By (54 total)

• Waterhouse v. State, 429 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1983)
  …lt with counsel. The officers were not prohibited from initiating further communication for the purpose of clarifying appellant’s request. Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F. 2d 768 (5th Cir.1979); Nash v. Estelle, 597 F. 2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981, 100 S.Ct. 485, 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979). Unlike in Edwards, appellant never explicitly stated that he did not want to talk to the police nor was he ever told that he was required to. Therefore the police did not act improperly in visiting appellant…
• Long v. State, 517 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1987)
  …desire for counsel and a desire to continue the interview without counsel, further inquiry is limited to clarifying the suspect’s wishes. Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F. 2d 768 (5th Cir.1979); Nash v. Estelle, 597 F. 2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981, 100 S.Ct. 485, 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979). Id. at 728-29 (emphasis supplied). The state argues that both officers did not believe appellant’s statement was a request for counsel and asserts that appellant’s willingness to discuss some areas and not ot…
• Valle v. State, 474 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 1985)
  …vocal one, and interrogating officers are permitted to initiate further communications for the purpose of clarifying the suspect’s wishes. Thompson v. Wainwright, 601 F. 2d 768 (5th Cir.1979); Nash v. Estelle, 597 F. 2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981, 100 S.Ct. 485, 62 L.Ed.2d 409 (1979). Thus, when the officer responded that “that was his constitutional right” and that he was there “hopefully to speak with him,” he was not conducting further interrogation within the meaning of Rhode Island v. I…