LEDUC
v.
FLORIDA; BEGLEY V. KENTUCKY ET AL.; KASSIMA V. UNITED STATES; CALVIN K. ET UX. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; STUDIFIN V. NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO.

U.S. | 1979-12-03
Nos. 78-6567; No. 78-6671; No. 78-6939; No. 79-5027; No. 79-5149
444 U.S. 985 Supreme Court of the United States (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Shiue, 650 F.2d 919 (8th Cir. 1981)
    …al or legal” to modify wrongfulness. See United States v. Frazier, 458 F. 2d 911, 918 n.7 (8th Cir. 1972). See generally United States v. Sibley, 595 F. 2d 1162, 1164 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937, 100 S.Ct. 286, 62 L.Ed.2d 196 reh. denied, 444 U.S. 985, 100 S.Ct. 494, 62 L.Ed.2d 414 (1979); United States v. Segna, 555 F. 2d 226, 232 (9th Cir. 1977). In this case the question of moral as opposed to legal wrongfulness was clearly presented throughout the trial. Under these circumstances, the modific…
  • Stephenson v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 748 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1984)
    …s to find it [the church] was operated exclusively for religious ... purposes.” Calvin K. v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 770, 772 (1978), aff’d, 603 F. 2d 211 (2d Cir.) (unpublished), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 872, 100 S.Ct. 151, 62 L.Ed.2d 98, reh'g denied, 444 U.S. 985, 100 S.Ct. 494, 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979). . Form 4029 stated that he was •it * * * * * ... conscientiously opposed to acceptance of the benefits of any private or public insurance which makes payments in the event of death, disability, old-age, or r…
  • Telford v. Clackamas Cnty. Hous. Auth., 710 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1983)
    …ployment entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause is determined by reference to state law. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Black v. Payne, 591 F. 2d 83, 88 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 985, 100 S.Ct. 493, 62 L.Ed.2d 414 (1979). The existence of a property interest in this case depends on the validity of Telford’s employment contract under Oregon law. The contract is valid under Oregon law if it created duties of a proprietary rather t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw