HUDSON ET AL.

v.

SMITH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Kenny v. Ambulatory Ctr. OF Miami, 400 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …Alaska Wood Products, Inc., 583 P. 2d 860 (Alaska 1978), rev’d on other grounds on rehearing, 601 P. 2d 584 (Alaska 1979); Rankins v. Commission on Professional Competence of Ducor, 24 Cal.3d 167, 593 P. 2d 852, 154 Cal.Rptr. 907, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 986, 100 S.Ct. 515, 62 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979); Maine Human Rights Commission v. Local 1361, United Paperworks International Union, 383 A. 2d 369 (Me.1978); American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, 93 Wis.2d 14, 286 N.W. 2d 847 (1979). Contra Corey v…
• Wilson v. Taylor, 658 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …not only material specifically offered in support of the motion, but also must consider all pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions properly a part of the record. Smith v. Hudson, 600 F. 2d 60 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 986, 100 S.Ct. 495, 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979); Moore, Federal Practice, 156.13[2] (1976) (“[Wjhile the pleadings are to be considered on a motion for summary judgment, they do not have controlling force.”) The officials have in effect pleaded that Wilson wa…
• Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharms., Inc., 862 F.2d 597 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …ry judgment is “likely to be inappropriate in cases where the issues involve intent.” Int’l Mining Co., Inc. v. Allen & Co., Inc., 567 F.Supp. 777 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (citations omitted). Accord, Smith v. Hudson, 600 F. 2d 60 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 986, 100 S.Ct. #95, 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979). B The first issue raised in Canderm’s appeal is the trial judge’s ruling on Can-derm’s claim of tortious interference with the contract between Elder and Canderm. The Ohio courts have defined tortious interfe…