BROWN

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1980)
  …apital cases in. Texas, and in particular the application of [§ 12.31 (b)] to the punishment issues, comports with the constitutional requirements [*43] of Witherspoon.” 577 S. W. 2d 717, 728 (1979). We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, 444 U. S. 990 (1979), limited to the following questions: “(1) Is the doctrine of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, applicable to the bifurcated procedure employed by Texas in capital cases? (2) If so, did the exclusion from jury service in the present cas…
• Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807 (U.S. 1980)
  …allow residents of deferral States to proceed with less diligence than was generally required. Because there is a conflict among the Courts of Appeals on the proper interpretation of the word “filed” in this statute,16 [*815] we granted certiorari. 444 U. S. 990.17 We now reverse. We first review the plain meaning of the relevant statutory language; we next examine the legislative history of the 1964 Act and the 1972 amendments for evidence that Congress intended the statute to have a different meaning; an…
• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …not reach that point. . This issue is raised by Hamilton and Harter. . Shortly before this opinion was announced, the Supreme Court overruled Jones v. United States, thus abandoning the possibility of automatic slanting. United States v. Salvicci, 444 U.S. 990, 100 S.Ct. 519, 62 L.Ed.2d 418 (1980). . For a detailed discussion of the concept of “expectation of privacy,” see United States v. Vicknair, 610 F. 2d 372, 379-81 (5th Cir. 1980). . For example, currency which had the fingerprints of a tonk opera…