CBS INC.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Knight v. State, 398 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …o. 2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. den., 390 So. 2d 360 (Fla.1980). . Liles v. State, 375 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. den., 383 So. 2d 1203 (Fla.1980). . E. g., United States v. Calandrella, 605 F. 2d 236, (6th Cir. 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 991, 100 S.Ct. 522, 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); Cobb v. State, 378 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Webb v. State, 373 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. den., 383 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 1980) (by implication). . United States v. Miller, 608 F. 2d 1089 (5th Cir.…
• Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1982)
  …“willfully overvalued” within the meaning of the statute, just as worthless securities presented as collateral for a loan are “willfully overvalued.” See United States v. Calandrella, 605 F. 2d 236 (CA6), cert. denied sub nom. Kaye v. United States, 444 U. S. 991 (1979). (3) The Court does not question that the second element of a § 1014 violation — that Williams presented his kited check for the purpose of influencing the bank to extend him credit in the form of a loan or an advance — is satisfied in this…
• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …ived in return for testifying, see United States v. Leonard, 494 F. 2d 955, 963 (D.C.Cir.1974), especially when the person is an admitted accomplice and a star witness, United States v. Barrentine, 591 F. 2d 1069, 1081 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991, 100 S.Ct. 521, 62 L.Ed.2d 419. But here, the jury was fully aware that the plea agreement permitted Townley to hide the details of his participation in crimes on foreign soil, and that this provision was critically important because it shielded Tow…