MOENCKMEIER

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …ived in return for testifying, see United States v. Leonard, 494 F. 2d 955, 963 (D.C.Cir.1974), especially when the person is an admitted accomplice and a star witness, United States v. Barrentine, 591 F. 2d 1069, 1081 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991, 100 S.Ct. 521, 62 L.Ed.2d 419. But here, the jury was fully aware that the plea agreement permitted Townley to hide the details of his participation in crimes on foreign soil, and that this provision was critically important because it shielded Tow…
• Am. Trucking Ass'n, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 642 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …410 U.S. 224, 93 S.Ct. 810, 35 L.Ed.2d 223 (1973); American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States, 344 U.S. 298, 73 S.Ct. 307, 97 L.Ed. 337 (1953); American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States, 602 F. 2d 444 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991, 100 S.Ct. 522, 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979). We need add nothing to the thorough discussion by the Chemical Leaman court explaining why neither the APA nor the Motor Carrier Act then in effect prevented the Commission from making a prospective finding of…
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. The United States, 640 F.2d 328 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …on February 26, 1979, sub nom. United States v. Bodcaw Co., 440 U.S. 202, 99 S.Ct. 1066, 59 L.Ed.2d 257 (1979), a fact noted by plaintiff in its reply brief. See also Leesona Corp. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. -, -, 599 F. 2d 958, 970, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991, 100 S.Ct. 522, 62 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979). Further, plaintiff’s statement that litigation expenses were awarded as part of a settlement in Hos-ford v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 149-70 on April 19, 1971, which involved a taking under the Park Act, is u…