COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

v.

QUINLIVAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (45 total)

• Agins et ux. v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1980)
  …opment of their property as the ordinances permit, there is as yet no concrete controversy regarding the application of the specific zoning provisions. See Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan, 406 U. S. 583, 588 (1972). See also Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U. S. 996, 997 (1979) (Powell, J., concurring). Thus, the only question properly before us is whether the mere enactment of the zoning ordinances constitutes a taking. The application of a general zoning law to particular property effects a taking if the or…
• United States v. Dion, 476 U.S. 734 (U.S. 1986)
  …utional authority, ... if clear and explicit, must be upheld by the courts, even in contravention of express stipulations in an earlier treaty” with a foreign power. Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 720 (1893); cf. Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U. S. 996 (1979). This Court applied that rule to congressional abrogation of Indian treaties in Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U. S. 553, 566 (1903). Congress, the Court concluded, has the power “to abrogate the provisions of an Indian treaty, though presum…
• Lawton Chiles, Jr. v. Thornburgh, 865 F.2d 1197 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …el lies against the government when acting in its sovereign capacity, if it engages in affirmative misconduct. Goldwater v. Carter, 617 F. 2d 697, 702 (D.C. Cir.) (citing Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. at 501, 95 S.Ct. at 2206), vacated on other grounds, 444 U.S. 996, 100 S.Ct. 533, 62 L.Ed.2d 428 (1979). C. The merits of the underlying claim are not irrelevant on appeal. The merits are relevant to the question of mootness — i. e. whether a live case and controversy still exists. It is not enough that a real c…

  ← 1 / 3 →